Original Article
The
Frequency and Causes of Visual Impairment and Blindness among Middle and Older
Population
Farnaz Siddiqui, Saba
Alkhairy, Mazhar-ul-Hassan
Pak J Ophthalmol 2017, Vol. 33 No. 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
See end of article for authors affiliations …..……………………….. Correspondence to: Farnaz Siddiqui Flate #F-6, Hassan Center Gulshan-e-Iqbal Block 16, Karachi Email:
siddiqui.farnaz@gmail.com. |
Purpose: To
estimate the frequency and causes of visual impairment and blindness in
middle and older age groups. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Eye department of Dow university
hospital (Ojha campus), Dow international medical college, Dow university of
health sciences, Karachi, Pakistan from January 2010 to October 2010. Material and Methods: 1000 subjects of aged ≥ 40
years were included in the study. We collected data from previous records in
which patients had undergone complete ophthalmic examination including visual
assessment by using Snellen’s visual acuity chart, examining the anterior segment
by slit lamp and dilated fundoscopy through slit lamp biomicroscopy with 90D
lens. The causes of visual impairment and blindness were recorded from
collected medical data. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS version 21. Results: The 1000 subjects records were analyzed. The
frequency of visual impairment and blindness were 142 (14.2%) and 49 (4.9%) respectively.
Major causes of visual impairment were cataract 61 (43.0%) and refractive
errors 44 (31.0%). Refractive errors 19 (38.8%) and cataract 18 (36.7%) were
the main causes of blindness. There was a significant difference for the
causes of visual impairment and blindness with normal individuals (p-value
< 0.01). Conclusion: The burden of visual impairment and
blindness remains a major health problem in our society and government need
to establish multiple policies and programs to prevent and control the visual
impairment and blindness. Key words: Causes,
visual impairment, blindness. |
Different eye disorders if left untreated lead to end stage of
functional blindness. The prevalence and causes of these disorders differ
markedly throughout the world. The percentage of blindness is particularly
severe in Asia1. According to World Health Organization (WHO), the
definition of blindness is corrected vision of less than 3/60 (20/400) in
better eye, or a decrease in visual field to less than 10 from fixation in each
eye and definition of low vision is corrected vision of less than 6/18(20/60)
but equal to or better than 3/60 in better eye2. The visual acuity
of less than 6/60 (20/200) is also used as a definition of blindness in many
developed countries3,4,5.
According to WHO estimations, currently there are 285 million
people are visually impaired world wide in 2010, 39 million are blind and 246
million have low vision.6 The individuals having blindness might
increase up to 76 million by 2020. About 90% of individuals having visual
impairment are belong to under developed countries7,8. Most of the
blind people are in older age group 50 years and above (82%). According to the
global estimate work, the infectious diseases causing visual impairment is
decreased for the last few years but the incidence of chronic noninfectious
diseases causing visual impairment are supposed to increase in number. About
80% of all visual impairment can be prevented and treated. Cataract and
refractive error are the most common causes of visual impairment and major
cause of blindness is cataract9,10. Data collected from the last few
years from many countries shows that there has been significant improvement in
prevention and treatment of visual impairment and this was achieved through a
number of successful international and local public-private partnerships.
The
principle aim of my study was to estimate the frequency and causes of visual
impairment and blindness in middle and older age population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was conducted from January 2010 to
October 2010 in the Ophthalmology department of Dow university hospital, Dow
international medical college, Karachi, Pakistan. Inclusion criteria were the
individuals of aged 40 or > 40 years to 70 or > 70 years and visual acuity
of 6/18 to ≤ 3/60. Exclusion criteria were the individuals of aged <
40 years and patients who had previously undergone ocular surgeries. These
subjects had gone through detailed eye examination which included measurement
of visual acuity, auto refraction, intraocular pressure measurement, slit lamp
examination and dilated fundoscopy by slit lamp biomicroscopy through 90D lens.
A well trained optometrist had assessed the visual acuity and auto refraction.
Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity assessment were done by using Snellen’s
visual acuity chart. Best corrected visual acuity was obtained by optimal
refraction subjectively after objective auto refraction. Goldmann applanation
tonometry was done to measure the intraocular pressure. Slit lamp examination
was done to look for eye lid pathologies, corneal and lens opacities to rule
out the cause of visual impairment (< 6/18 - 3/60) and blindness (< 3/60)
according to WHO criteria for definition of visual impairment and blindness.
Detailed fundal examination was done by slit lamp biomicroscopy through 90D
lens to look for vitreous and retinal pathologies.
Blindness was assessed as those individuals were
reported visual acuity (VA) < 3/60, and also those reported counting fingers
(CF), hand movement (HM), perception light (PL), and no perception light (NPL)
were also categorized as “Blindness”. “Visual impairment” (VI) was computed as
those individuals who reported VA<6/18-3/60.
All analysis were performed using statistical
analysis software SPSS version 21.Frequencies and proportions were reported for
categorical variables including outcome measures blindness and visual
impairment. Chi-square analysis was used to assess the association between
blindness and visual impairment with effect of age and gender and the results were
reported. The causes of visual impairment and blindness were also assessed.
Chi-square analysis was also used to compare the different causes of visual
impairment and blindness with normal individuals. The P-value of ≤0.05
was considered statistically significant.
RESULT
The 1000 subjects were examined. Out of 1000 subjects 532 (53.2%)
subjects were male and 468 (46.8%) subjects were female. 49 (4.9%) persons were
have blindness (VA < 3/60), in which 40 (4.0%) persons were found to have
unilateral blindness and 9 (0.9%) were found to have bilateral blindness and
142 (14.2%) were have visual impairment (VA < 6/18 - 3/60), in which 87 (8.7%)
were having unilateral visual impairment and 55 (5.5%) were having bilateral
visual impairment (Table 1). The frequency of visual impairment and blindness
were 142 (14.2%) and 49 (4.9%) respectively (Table 2). The effect of age and
gender on blindness and visual impairment were shown in (Table 3). Most of
blindness and visual impairment was found above the age of 50 years.
Causes of blindness and visual impairment were given in table 4. The
leading causes of blindness were refractive errors 19 (38.8%), cataract 18 (36.7%)
and diabetic retinopathy 9 (18.4%). Major causes of visual impairment were
cataract 61 (43.0%) and refractive errors 44 (31.0%). Comparison between the
causes of visual impairment and blindness with normal individuals were shown in
table 5 with a significant p-value of less than 0.01.
DISCUSSION
The current study showed that cataract, refractive
errors and diabetic retinopathy are the common causes of visual impairment and
blindness presenting to ophthalmology department, Dow university hospital (Ojha
campus), Karachi. The frequency of visual
Table
1: Frequency of blindness and visual impairment (n = 1000).
Normal |
|
795 |
Bilateral
Blindness |
9 |
0.9% |
Bilateral VI |
55 |
5.5% |
Unilateral
Blindness |
40 |
4.0% |
Unilateral
VI |
87 |
8.7% |
Blindness +
VI |
14 |
1.4% |
VI: visual
impairment |
|
|
Table
2: Frequency of blindness and visual impairment (n = 1000).
|
n |
% |
Normal |
795 |
79.5% |
|
|
|
Blindness |
49 |
4.9% |
|
|
|
VI |
142 |
14.2% |
Blindness +
VI |
14 |
1.4% |
VI: visual
impairment |
|
|
Table 3: Blindness and
visual impairment regarding age and sex. (n = 205).
|
Blindness n (%) |
Visual
impairment n (%) |
Both
conditions n (%) |
p-value* |
Age
Group |
||||
40 – 49 |
14 (28.6) |
29 (20.4) |
2 (14.3) |
0.798 |
50 – 59 |
16 (32.7) |
41 (28.9) |
4 (28.6) |
|
60 – 69 |
12 (24.5) |
43 (30.3) |
5 (35.7) |
|
70 + |
7 (14.3) |
29 (20.4) |
3 (21.4) |
|
Sex |
||||
Male |
26 (53.1) |
76 (53.5) |
7 (50.0) |
0.969 |
Female |
23 (46.9) |
66 (46.5) |
7 (50.0) |
|
p-value* calculated by using Chi-square analysis |
Table 4: Causes of
blindness and visual impairment. (n = 205).
Causes |
Blindness n(%) |
Visual
impairment n(%) |
Both
conditions n(%) |
Diabetic
retinopathy |
9 (18.4) |
19 (13.4) |
- |
Refractive
error |
19 (38.8) |
44 (31.0) |
9 (64.3) |
Conjunctivitis |
2 (4.1) |
13 (9.2) |
1 (7.1) |
Cataract |
18 (36.7) |
61 (43.0) |
4 (28.6) |
Corneal
Opacity |
1 (2.0) |
5 (3.5) |
|
Table
5: Causes of blindness and visual impairment with
normal individuals (n = 1000).
Causes |
Blindness |
Normal |
P-value |
Diabetic
Retinopathy |
28 (13.7) |
118 (14.8) |
< 0.01 |
Refractive
error |
72 (35.1) |
449 (56.5) |
|
Conjunctivitis |
16 (7.8) |
122 (15.3) |
|
Cataract |
83 (40.5) |
97 (12.2) |
|
Corneal
Opacity |
6 (2.9) |
9 (1.1) |
|
VI: Visual
Impairment p-value*
calculated by using Chi-square analysis |
impairment and blindness among adults
≥ 40 years to older age groups > 70 years were 142 (14.2%) and 49 (4.9%)
respectively. The study conducted in North Kordofan State, Sudan7
showed that 8.37% prevalence of blindness of bilateral eyes and 9.06% prevalence
of visual impairment of bilateral eyes. The results are comparable to our study
in which the frequency of visual impairment was higher as compare to frequency
of blindness. Another study conducted in Sudan11 showed the
prevalence of blindness in Northern State was 4.90%, 7.38% in Sinnar and 14% in
Kassala. Our study showed the decrease in the frequency of blindness as compare
to above quoted studies may be because of overall increase in the availability
of eye care services as well as increase in the knowledge of general population
regarding solutions like surgeries, refractive devices to manage the problems
associated with visual impairment and blindness.
Association of blindness and visual
impairment with effect to the different age groups and gender was not
statistically significant in our study with p-value of 0.798 and 0.969
respectively while several studies12-16 showed significant
association of age and gender with the prevalence of blindness and visual
impairment.
Our study showed that refractive errors
were the most common cause of blindness. The results are comparable to other
recent studies17-19 showed the refractive errors were the primary
cause of blindness. Cataract was the second most common cause of blindness in
our study. Several studies conducted in Africa and Asia20,21 have
showed that the blindness and visual impairment were caused by cataract.
Cataract is a curable condition and the burden of blindness caused by cataract
can be reduced by public health awareness and cataract surgical services.
In summary, the frequency of visual impairment and
blindness was 142 (14.2%) and 49 (4.9%) respectively. Refractive errors,
cataract and diabetic retinopathy were the major causes of blindness. Cataract
and refractive errors were the main causes of visual impairment.
CONCLUSION
The current study provides the useful information
regarding the burden of visual impairment and blindness in our society and this
burden can be reduced with early treatment and avoided by different preventive
measures such as awareness, visual screening, early correction of refractive
error, cataract surgeries for those individuals requiring it and effective
visual rehabilitation for all visually impaired people.
Author’s Affiliation
Dr. Farnaz
Siddiqui
Assistant Professor
Department of Ophthalmology
Dow International Medical College (DIMC)
Dow University Hospital (DUH)
Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS)
Karachi
Dr. Saba Alkhairy
Assistant Professor
Department of Ophthalmology
Dow International Medical College (DIMC)
Dow University Hospital (DUH)
Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS)
Karachi
Dr.
Mazhar-ul-Hassan
Professor
Department of Ophthalmology
Dow International Medical College (DIMC)
Dow University Hospital (DUH)
Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS)
Karachi
Role of Authors
Dr. Farnaz Siddiqui
Paper Writing, Data Collection.
Dr. Saba Alkhairy
Data Collection.
Dr.
Mazhar-ul-Hassan
Statistical Analysis.
REFERENCES
1.
Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP, et al. 2002 global update of available data on visual impairment: a
compilation of population-based prevalence studies. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;
11: 67-115.
2.
Dandona L and Dandona R.
Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical
Classification of Diseases. BMC Medicine 2006; 4: 7.
3.
Congdon N, O’colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Eye diseases prevalence research group: causes and prevalence of
visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;
122: 477-85.
4.
Laitinen A, Koskinen S, Harkanen T, et al. A nation wide population-based survey on visual acuity, near
vision and self reported visual function in the adult population in Finland.
Ophthalmology, 2005; 112: 2227-37.
5.
Taylor HR, Keefe JE, Vu HTV, et al. Vision
loss in Australia. Med J Aust. 2005; 182: 565-8.
6.
Holden BA. Blindness and Poverty: A
tragic combination. Clin Exp Optom 2007; 90: 401-3.
7.
Binnawi KH, Mohamed AH, Alkhair Alshafae B, et al. Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in
population aged 50 years and over in North Kordofan State, Sudan. Albasar Int J
Ophthalmol. 2015; 3: 6-10.
8.
Geneva, Switzerland: World
Health Organization, 2009- 2013. World Health Organization. Action plan for the
prevention of Avoidable Blindness and visual impairment.
9.
Salamao SR, Marcia RKH, Mitsuhiro, et al. Visual impairment and
blindness: an overview of prevalence and causes in Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc.
2009; 81: 539-49.
10.
Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global
estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96: 614-8.
11.
Progress in Prevention of Blindness
in Sudan (2003-2010).Unpublished report by Sudan National Program for
Prevention of Blindness; 2011.
12.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M,
Emamian MH, et al. Visual
impairment in the 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran. Eye (Lond). 2012;
26: 1071-7.
13.
Kyari F, Gudlavalleti MV, Sivsubramaniam S, et al. Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: The
National Blindness and Visual Impairment Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 2033-9.
14.
Zhao J, Ellwein LB, Cui H, et al. Prevalence of vision impairment
in older adults in rural China; The China nine-province survey. Ophthalmology,
2010; 117: 409-16.
15.
Zheng Y, Lavanya R, Wu R, et al.
prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in an urban Indian
population; The Singapore Indian Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 1798-1804.
16.
Budenz DL, Bandi JR, Barton K, et al.
Blindness and visual impairment in an urban West African population: The Tema
Eye Survey. Ophthalmology, 2012; 119: 1744-53.
17.
Rajavi Z, Katibeh M, Ziaei H, et al. Rapid
assessment of avoidable blindness in Iran. Ophthalmology, 2011; 118: 1813-8.
18.
Al-Shaaln FF, Bakman MA, Ibrahim AM, et al. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment among Saudi adults
attending primary health care centres in northern Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;
31: 473-80.
19.
You QS, Xu L, Yang H, et al.
Five-year incidence of visual impairment and blindness in adult Chinese the
Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 2011; 118: 1069-75.
20. Wang GQ, Bai ZX, Shi J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for eye diseases,
blindness and low vision in Lhasa, Tibet. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013; 6: 237-41.
21.
Li J, Zhong H, Cai n, et al. The prevalence and causes of
visual impairment an elderly Chinese Bai ethnic rural population: The Yunnan
minority eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 4498-504.